Stay granted on debiting Central Excise duty for Education Cess. Precedent cited for waiver.

The stay petition against the Order-in-Appeal debiting Central Excise duty for Education Cess and Senior and Higher Education Cess from the RG-23 account was granted by Mr. H.K. Thakur. Citing a precedent where a waiver was granted in a similar case, the stay was given on the recoveries of confirmed dues and penalties until the appeal's disposal. The decision was influenced by the consistency of views within the Bench and the relevance of the previous case in determining the outcome of the current petition.

---

---

Issues involved: Stay petition against Order-in-Appeal debiting Central Excise duty for payment of Education Cess and Senior and Higher Education Cess from RG-23 account.

Analysis:
1. Stay Petition against Order-in-Appeal: The stay petition was filed against Order-in-Appeal No. 184/2013(Raj)CE/AK/Commr(A)/Ahd dated 25.04.2012. The primary issue revolved around debiting Central Excise duty for the payment of Education Cess and Senior and Higher Education Cess from the RG-23 account maintained by the appellant.

2. Arguments by Appellant: Shri Dhaval Shah, the advocate representing the appellant, relied on various case laws to support the plea for granting a stay in the case. The appellant cited judgments such as the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court judgment in the case of CCE & S.T., Vapi vs. Madras Industries Textiles, a decision by CESTAT Ahmedabad Bench in the case of Aaren Syntex Pvt. Limited vs. CCE Vapi, and other relevant cases to bolster the argument for the stay.

3. Arguments by Revenue: Dr. J. Nagori, representing the Revenue, contended that the judgments cited by the appellant had been appropriately distinguished by the Commissioner (Appeals) and were not directly applicable to the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

4. Decision and Rationale: After hearing both sides, Mr. H.K. Thakur observed that the Ahmedabad Bench had previously granted a waiver of confirmed dues in a similar case involving Indian Steel Corporation Limited vs. CCE, Rajkot. Given this precedent, Mr. H.K. Thakur decided to grant a stay on the recoveries of confirmed dues and penalties until the appeal was disposed of. This decision was based on the consistency of views within the Bench and the relevance of the previous case in determining the outcome of the current petition.

This comprehensive analysis outlines the key issues, arguments presented by both parties, and the rationale behind the decision taken by Mr. H.K. Thakur regarding the stay petition against the Order-in-Appeal related to the debiting of Central Excise duty for Education Cess and Senior and Higher Education Cess.

---