Tribunal grants stay on dues pending appeal in Cenvat credit case The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of confirmed dues until the appeal is disposed of in a case involving Cenvat credit on input services for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal grants stay on dues pending appeal in Cenvat credit case
The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of confirmed dues until the appeal is disposed of in a case involving Cenvat credit on input services for exporting raw bauxite. The appellant demonstrated compliance with export procedures and proper documentation, disputing the Revenue's claim that raw bauxite was directly exported from the mines. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the limitation issue, noting their adherence to procedures and accurate reporting, indicating no intent to evade Central Excise duty.
Issues: - Cenvat credit on input services for export of raw bauxite - Time-barred demand for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09
Analysis: The appellant filed a stay petition against Order-in-Appeal No. 72/2013, concerning the issue of taking cenvat credit on input services for exporting raw bauxite. The appellant argued that they are entitled to the credit as they follow proper export procedures and documentations for raw bauxite cleared for export or used in manufacturing excisable goods. The demand raised for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09 was claimed to be time-barred by the appellant's advocate.
The Revenue contended that raw bauxite is directly exported from the mines by the appellant and never brought to the factory premises. However, during the hearing, the Revenue failed to provide any documentary evidence supporting their claim that raw bauxite is directly exported from the mines. The appellant, on the other hand, demonstrated that they bring raw bauxite to their factory premises before exporting it, supported by proper export documents and accurate periodical returns filed with the department.
Considering the arguments presented, the Tribunal found that the appellant had made a prima facie case in their favor regarding the limitation issue. It was observed that the appellant's compliance with export procedures and accurate reporting in their returns indicated no intention to evade Central Excise duty. Consequently, a stay was granted on the recovery of confirmed dues until the appeal is disposed of, based on the appellant's prima facie case in their favor.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
