TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court affirms Tribunal's decision on share application money restriction under Income-tax Act</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III Versus NAMASTEY CHEMICALS PVT LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III Versus NAMASTEY CHEMICALS PVT LTD. - TMI Issues:Addition of Rs.55 lacs under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2001-02 based on share application money received by the assessee company.Analysis:The primary issue in this case revolved around the addition of Rs.55 lacs made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee company had received share application money from various individuals. The Assessing Officer categorized the receipts and found discrepancies in confirmations from share applicants, leading to the additions. The Commissioner (Appeals) restricted the addition to Rs.13,00,100 after considering confirmations submitted by the appellant and discrepancies in different categories of share applicants.The subsequent cross-appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue were disposed of by the Tribunal. The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal and rejected the Revenue's appeal. It further reduced the addition to Rs.9 lacs, deleting an additional Rs.4,00,100. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Apex Court in CIT v. Lovely Export (P.) Ltd. [2010] 14 SCC 761, emphasizing the importance of subscriber identity in share application money cases. The Tribunal held that the addition should be restricted to Rs.9 lacs for share applicants who denied making any investment, in line with the Supreme Court's judgment.The Tribunal's decision was challenged by the Revenue, arguing that the Tribunal erred in applying the principles of Lovely Export (P.) Ltd. case. However, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the identity of subscribers was established, and discrepancies were addressed through responses from share applicants. The High Court concluded that the issue fell within the scope of the Supreme Court's judgment in Lovely Exports (supra), and no legal error was found in the Tribunal's decision. As a result, the Tax Appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision and the principles established in the Lovely Export (P.) Ltd. case.
TaxTMI 