Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning duty liability on goods cleared under the Served from India Scheme.
Analysis: The appellants contended that clearances made under the Served from India Scheme under Notification No. 34/2006-C.E. were not exempt clearances so as to attract the demand for reversal or payment of 10% of the value of the goods. The Tribunal noted the earlier view of the Bangalore Bench that debits made in SFIS would not amount to exemption from payment of duty, and observed that this contention carried prima facie strength on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The appellants were granted stay and further pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived till final disposal of the appeal.