Appeal partly upheld: Arrears of fees deleted, expenses disallowed. TDS credit issue referred for verification.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of arrears of professional fees and disallowance of expenses. However, the issue of TDS credit was remitted back to the AO for verification and appropriate action.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deletion of addition made by the AO on account of arrear of professional fees received after discontinuation of legal profession.
2. Deletion of disallowance made by the AO on account of expenses claimed by the assessee.
3. Admission of additional ground to allow credit of TDS omitted in the return of income.

Issue 1: Deletion of Addition of Arrears of Professional Fees

The Department's appeal challenged the CIT (A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 67,86,669/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of arrears of professional fees received by the assessee after discontinuation of his legal profession. The AO argued that such receipts should be taxable under Section 176(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which states that any sum received after the discontinuation of a profession shall be deemed to be the income of the recipient and charged to tax accordingly in the year of receipt. The AO cited the Supreme Court decision in 'Nalinikant Ambalal Modi Vs. SAL Narayan Rao' which held that the fruits of professional activity are taxable irrespective of when they are received, but this was under the Income Tax Act, 1922, which lacked specific provisions for such receipts unlike the 1961 Act.

The CIT (A) deleted the addition, relying on judicial precedents such as 'CIT v. Justice R.M. Datta' and 'Justice Kuldip Singh v. ITO', which suggested that arrears of professional receipts received after discontinuation of legal profession were not assessable. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, noting that Section 176(4) introduces a legal fiction to deem such receipts as income but does not specify under which head of income they should be taxed. Therefore, these receipts cannot be taxed under "Profits and Gains of Business, Profession or Vocation" or "Income from Other Sources" as the assessee did not carry on any profession during the relevant year.

Issue 2: Deletion of Disallowance of Expenses

The AO disallowed Rs. 75,523/- claimed by the assessee for expenses on printing and stationery, conveyance, telephone, and accounting, arguing that these expenses were not incidental to the assessee's profession. The CIT (A) deleted the disallowance, noting that the expenses were nominal and incurred for maintaining proper accounts and recovering outstanding fees. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT (A), stating that since the gross receipts were not liable to tax, the related expenses should not be disallowed.

Issue 3: Admission of Additional Ground for TDS Credit

The assessee sought credit for TDS of Rs. 53,351/- which was inadvertently omitted in the return of income. The CIT (A) allowed this credit, directing the AO to verify the claim and allow the credit as per law. The Department contended that TDS credit could only be given if claimed in the return of income, citing 'Goetze India Ltd. vs. CIT' which pertains to the powers of the ITAT, not the CIT (A). The Tribunal found that the omission was an inadvertent error and directed the AO to verify the claim and allow the credit as per law.

Conclusion

The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s deletion of the addition of arrears of professional fees and disallowance of expenses. However, it remitted the issue of TDS credit back to the AO for verification and appropriate action.

---