Reassessment based on escaped freight turnover upheld where separate freight charges were not proved from the record.

Where a dealer fails to produce freight-related account books, challans, delivery documents, or other verifiable proof that freight was separately charged and excluded from turnover, the assessing authority may validly form a reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment. The court found that the record, including service tax returns and railway receipts, did not satisfactorily establish the claim of separate freight charging, and that the Tribunal's contrary factual view was unsupported by the record. On that basis, permission for reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act was upheld and the challenge to it failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether permission for reassessment under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was validly granted on the ground that freight, though claimed to be separately charged, had escaped assessment as part of turnover.

Analysis: The writ court found that the petitioner had not produced the relevant freight-related account books, challans, delivery documents, or verifiable evidence before the assessing authority or the appellate authorities to establish that freight was in fact separately charged and excluded from turnover. The records from the assessment and reassessment proceedings, including the service tax returns and railway receipts, supported the view that the claim of separate freight charging was not satisfactorily demonstrated. The court also held that the Tribunal's contrary factual findings were not supported by the record. On that basis, the authority granting permission for reassessment had material to form the requisite belief that freight turnover had escaped assessment.

Conclusion: The permission for reassessment was upheld and the challenge to it failed.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition was dismissed, and the reassessment proceedings were permitted to continue on the basis that the freight component had not been shown to be conclusively excluded from taxable turnover.

Ratio Decidendi: Where relevant material is not produced to substantiate that freight was separately charged and excluded from turnover, the authority may validly form a reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment and initiate reassessment.

---