Input service and place of removal: outward clinker transport beyond the factory gate was treated as outside Cenvat credit coverage.

GTA transportation of clinker from the factory to a depot for onward movement was examined against the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The analysis treated the concept of "place of removal" as relevant for transportation up to that point, but noted that for clinker, which attracted specific duty, the factory gate was treated prima facie as the place where duty became payable on removal. On that basis, transportation after clearance from the factory was treated prima facie as outside input service, and no prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit. The disputed Cenvat credit was therefore directed to be deposited within the stipulated time.

---

---

Issues: Whether GTA service used for transportation of clinker from the factory to the depot for onward movement to another unit was covered by the definition of input service, and whether a prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the outward transportation was taken up to the place of removal. The definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 covered transportation up to the place of removal, but the definition of place of removal in Section 4(3)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held to be relevant in the context of valuation under Section 4 and ad valorem duty. As clinker attracted specific duty, the place of removal was treated prima facie as the factory gate from which duty became payable on removal. On that basis, transportation after removal from the factory was held prima facie outside input service. The appellant therefore failed to establish a prima facie case for waiver.

Conclusion: The claim for waiver of pre-deposit was rejected, and the appellant was directed to deposit the disputed Cenvat credit amount within the stipulated time.

---