Tribunal confirms Rs. 23,98,000 fixed deposit, remands for Rs. 2,12,000 opening balance verification.

The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 23,98,000/- related to fixed deposits but directed the Assessing Officer to verify the alternative claim concerning opening balances of Rs. 2,12,000/-. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part for statistical purposes, remanding the matter for further verification.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Sustaining of addition on account of fixed deposits.
2. Consideration of evidence and written submissions by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and CIT(A).
3. Compliance with specific directions given by CIT(A) and opportunity for the assessee during remand proceedings.
4. Decision on the alternative claim regarding opening balances included in the addition.
5. Right to amend or withdraw grounds of appeal.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Sustaining of Addition on Account of Fixed Deposits:
The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 53,82,000/- made by the A.O. under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. observed that the assessee had borrowed Rs. 2,64,34,000/- through fixed deposits and sought confirmations from depositors. Confirmations for Rs. 56,35,000/- were not received, leading to the addition. The CIT(A) allowed relief of Rs. 2,53,000/- but confirmed the addition for the remaining amount. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions for the unconfirmed deposits.

2. Consideration of Evidence and Written Submissions:
The assessee argued that the A.O. and CIT(A) did not consider the evidence and detailed submissions provided. The Tribunal found that the A.O. had issued letters to depositors and received few confirmations. The CIT(A) considered the A.O.'s remand report and the assessee's submissions but found the evidence insufficient. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the assessee to prove the identity, capacity, and genuineness of the transactions.

3. Compliance with Specific Directions and Opportunity During Remand Proceedings:
The assessee contended that the A.O. did not comply with CIT(A)'s directions and did not provide an opportunity during remand proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the A.O. issued letters and sought confirmations but did not receive satisfactory responses. The Tribunal held that the burden of proof under Section 68 lies with the assessee, who failed to discharge it adequately.

4. Alternative Claim Regarding Opening Balances:
The assessee claimed that the addition included opening balances of Rs. 2,12,000/-, which should not be added under Section 68. The Tribunal accepted this alternative contention, noting that Section 68 applies to credits in the previous year and not to renewals of earlier deposits. The Tribunal directed the A.O. to verify the claim and delete the addition to the extent of Rs. 29,84,000/- if found correct.

5. Right to Amend or Withdraw Grounds of Appeal:
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's right to amend, alter, or withdraw grounds of appeal before the hearing date. However, no specific amendments or withdrawals were noted during the proceedings.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 23,98,000/- and remanded the matter to the A.O. for verification of the alternative claim regarding renewals of fixed deposits amounting to Rs. 29,84,000/-. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---