Appeal partially allowed on repair expenditure classification: premises repairs as capital, air conditioner repairs as revenue. Decision July 5, 2013.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of expenditure on premises repairs as capital expenditure due to enduring benefits, while allowing the expenditure on air conditioner repairs as revenue expenditure since it did not result in a new asset. The decision was rendered on 5th July 2013.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of expenditure incurred on repairs to the premises taken on rental.
2. Disallowance of expenditure incurred on repairs to air conditioners.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Expenditure on Repairs to Premises:

The primary issue revolves around the disallowance of Rs. 56,67,543/- claimed by the assessee as revenue expenditure for repairs on rented premises. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing drug/pharma products, had its total turnover increased by 13.8%, while "other operating expenses" surged by 27.27%. The AO scrutinized these expenses and found that the assessee had claimed capital expenditure as revenue expenditure. Specifically, the assessee debited Rs. 49,52,153/- for building repairs and Rs. 20,61,093/- for other repairs under "Other Operation Expenses." The AO concluded that the repairs were capital in nature, providing enduring benefits, and thus, should be capitalized. Consequently, the AO allowed depreciation at 5% on the capitalized amount and disallowed the remaining Rs. 56,67,543/-, adding it back to the assessee's total income.

Upon appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the expenses were major repairs and renovations, making the premises suitable for the licensee. The CIT(A) cited Explanation 1 to Section 32(1), which allows depreciation on expenditures for renovation or improvement of leased premises.

The Tribunal observed that the assessee had taken the premises on lease from a sister concern for Rs. 3,000/- per month and later renovated it for Rs. 59,65,835/-. Post-renovation, the premises were leased to S. Kumar Nationwide Ltd. for Rs. 15,00,000/- per month. The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure was capital in nature, providing enduring benefits in the form of substantial rental income and refundable security deposits. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the cited cases by the assessee were not relevant as they involved expenditures for business advantages, not for creating income sources.

2. Disallowance of Expenditure on Repairs to Air Conditioners:

The second issue pertains to the disallowance of Rs. 32,230/- for repairs to air conditioners, specifically for replacing damaged compressors. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was for replacing old, damaged compressors and did not result in a new asset. Therefore, the expenditure was deemed revenue in nature. The Tribunal allowed this ground of appeal, directing the AO to withdraw the depreciation allowed on this amount.

Conclusion:

The appeal was allowed in part. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the expenditure on premises repairs as capital expenditure, while it allowed the expenditure on air conditioner repairs as revenue expenditure. The order was pronounced in the open court on 5th July, 2013.

---