TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B(ii) or section 35B(iii), or both, on the footing that the foreign buyer was located through the Indian agent and the commission was paid in India.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77.
Analysis: The issue was covered by the Court's earlier decision holding that the claimed expenditure did not qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B(ii) or section 35B(iii), or both, on the footing that the foreign buyer was located through the Indian agent and the commission was paid in India.
Analysis: The issue was governed by the Court's earlier decision dealing with the scope of the relevant clauses of section 35B and the place and manner of incurring the commission expenditure.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was held not entitled to the claimed weighted deduction under section 35B, and both referred questions were decided against it.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim for weighted deduction under section 35B fails where the expenditure does not fall within the qualifying statutory categories, including the manner and place of incurring the commission expenditure.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
