Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to retesting of samples drawn by the department under the excise instructions, and whether such request could be refused on the ground that the original test reports were clear, complete, and obtained from recognised laboratories.
Analysis: The applicable instructions permitted an assessee dissatisfied with the chemical test to seek retesting within the prescribed time on payment of the prescribed fee. Once the statutory and procedural conditions were met, the request could not be rejected on considerations such as the department's satisfaction with the original reports or the fact that the reports came from recognised laboratories. Denial of the right to retest in a matter having direct civil consequences and potential penal consequences was held to offend principles of natural justice. The reasons supplied for refusal were found to be irrelevant to the exercise of the retesting right.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to retesting of the samples, and the refusal to permit retesting was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory or instruction-based right of retesting exists, compliance with the prescribed application and fee requirements is sufficient, and the request cannot be refused on the ground that the department considers the original test report adequate or conclusive.