TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules toll charges under BOT not liable for Service Tax</h1> <h3>M/s IDAA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-II</h3> M/s IDAA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-II - 2013 (32) S.T.R. 561 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:- Classification of Toll charges as Business Auxiliary Service for Service Tax liability.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI was directed against an Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II. The case involved M/s. IDAA Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., engaged by NHAI for road extension and improvement on a BOT basis. The dispute arose when the department claimed that Toll charges collected by the appellant on behalf of NHAI fell under Business Auxiliary Service, making them liable for Service Tax. A show-cause notice demanding Service Tax was issued for the period 2006-07 and 2010-11. The appellant argued that they collected Toll charges for themselves to finance road widening and improvement, not on behalf of NHAI. They relied on Circular No.152/3/2012-ST, which clarified that under BOT arrangements, if an SPV collects Tolls on its own account, it is not subject to Service Tax.The Commissioner (A.R.) representing the Revenue supported the lower authority's findings. The Tribunal, while considering the stay application, examined the Circular which stated that Tolls collected by an SPV under a BOT arrangement on its own account are not subject to Service Tax. The Tribunal noted that if Tolls are collected by the Concessionaire independently, it does not constitute a taxable service. Based on this clarification, the Tribunal granted an unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of the dues adjudged against the appellant in the impugned order, staying the recovery during the appeal's pendency. The judgment favored the appellant's argument that Toll charges collected for road improvement were not Business Auxiliary Services, aligning with the Circular's interpretation under the BOT arrangement.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
