Remission for goods destroyed by fire supports waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during appeal.

Fire destruction of excisable or imported goods was treated as a basis for interim relief under the remission framework in Section 23 of the Customs Act and Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules. Because the fire was undisputed and the only objection concerned alleged lack of adequate precautions, the appellant was granted total waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal. The reference to the disputed duty not being included in any insurance claim was noted for verification at the regular hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty demands arising from goods destroyed in fire.

Analysis: The claimed remission was examined with reference to Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Those provisions permit remission where imported or excisable goods are lost or destroyed before clearance or removal due to loss, destruction, natural cause or unavoidable accident. As the occurrence of fire was not disputed and the only objection was that adequate precautions were not taken, the case was treated as one fit for interim relief. The statement that the disputed duties were not included in any insurance claim was also recorded for verification at the regular hearing.

Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where destruction of goods by fire is undisputed, remission provisions for lost or destroyed goods justify interim waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

---