Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, being a lessor of vehicles under lease arrangements, was entitled to depreciation under Section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The allowance of depreciation depends on ownership of the asset and its use for the purposes of business. The Court followed the binding Supreme Court ruling that, in a leasing business, the lessor can be treated as the owner of the vehicles for depreciation purposes even if the vehicles are registered in the lessees' names. The Court also noted that the business of leasing itself satisfies the user requirement under Section 32, because the assets are employed in the assessee's business of earning lease income. The question of hire-purchase was found irrelevant to the actual controversy.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to depreciation under Section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.