Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10B after takeover of an existing 100% Export Oriented Unit by way of slump sale, and whether the transfer violated the conditions relating to splitting up of business, use of previously used machinery, or loss of 100% EOU status.
Analysis: The undertaking taken over by the assessee was held to be the same existing unit transferred as a whole along with its assets and liabilities as a going concern. On the facts, there was no splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, because the transfer was not of a part of the undertaking but of the entire undertaking that had already been enjoying section 10B benefit. The objection based on domestic turnover did not defeat the claim, since the undertaking had continued to hold approval as a 100% EOU and the status was not shown to have been withdrawn by the competent authority. Likewise, the objection regarding old machinery was rejected because it was not a case of transfer of selected used machinery into a new business, but of transfer of the whole undertaking.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10B for the years under consideration, and the disallowance was unsustainable.