Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent's activity of erecting metal crash barriers during the period 23.10.2003 to 23.01.2004 was taxable as erection, commissioning or installation service under the Finance Act.
Analysis: The relevant statutory definitions covered commissioning or installation services provided by an agency in relation to plant, machinery or equipment, and the taxable service was service provided by such an agency in relation to commissioning or installation. The activity in question was treated by the original authority as erection of equipment. However, the levy of erection service was brought into the service tax net only from 10.09.2004. Since the services were rendered before that date, the demand could not be sustained for the earlier period.
Conclusion: The respondent was not liable to service tax for the period in dispute under erection, commissioning or installation service.