Customs duty exemption on melting scrap accepted prima facie, while special additional duty relief was limited by clearance conditions.

The Tribunal considered prima facie entitlement to customs and special additional duty exemptions on iron and steel melting scrap. It accepted that the scrap fell within the entry in Notification No. 21/2002-Cus and treated that exemption as unconditional, so a prima facie case existed for basic customs duty relief. For special additional duty under Notification No. 23/2003-CE, entitlement depended on compliance with the domestic tariff area clearance conditions and scrap norms; as ad hoc norms were sought only from 04.07.2009, the benefit was not shown prima facie for the earlier period. Partial interim relief was granted, with a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs and stay of the balance.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for exemption from basic customs duty on iron and steel melting scrap under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002; (ii) whether the appellant was entitled to exemption from special additional duty on clearances of scrap to the domestic tariff area under Notification No. 23/2003-CE dated 31.03.2003 and, on that basis, what pre-deposit was warranted.

Issue (i): Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for exemption from basic customs duty on iron and steel melting scrap under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002.

Analysis: The scrap cleared by the appellant was iron and steel melting scrap covered by the relevant entry in the notification. The notification was treated as unconditional, and no separate condition was found to deny the exemption merely because the scrap had been sold in the domestic tariff area.

Conclusion: The appellant had a prima facie case for exemption from basic customs duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002.

Issue (ii): Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption from special additional duty on clearances of scrap to the domestic tariff area under Notification No. 23/2003-CE dated 31.03.2003 and, on that basis, what pre-deposit was warranted.

Analysis: The benefit of special additional duty exemption depended upon compliance with the conditions governing domestic tariff area clearances and the relevant norms for waste and scrap. The appellant sought fixation of ad hoc norms only on 04.07.2009, whereas clearances had commenced earlier. The Tribunal therefore formed a prima facie view that the benefit was not available for the period prior to that date. Considering the amount involved and the plea of limitation, partial pre-deposit was directed.

Conclusion: The appellant was not shown to be prima facie entitled to special additional duty exemption for the period prior to 04.07.2009, and a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs was ordered with stay of recovery of the balance on compliance.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted only in part, with the demand remaining stayed to the extent of the balance after the directed pre-deposit.

---