Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to claim exemption as a transit sale under section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act in respect of goods supplied under hire purchase arrangements, and whether endorsement of documents of title in transit was sufficient notwithstanding the absence of transfer of property in the goods.
Analysis: The definition of "sale" in section 2(g) of the Central Sales Tax Act, as applicable to the assessment year, expressly includes transfer of goods on hire purchase. The Court applied the principle that in a hire purchase transaction the statutory focus is on transfer of goods and not on immediate transfer of property in the goods. It also relied on the settled distinction between transfer of property in goods and transfer of goods on hire purchase, and held that the later amendment to the definition did not detract from the position relevant to the year in question. Since the undisputed facts showed endorsement of title to the goods while they were in transit, the assessee's claim satisfied section 3(b).
Conclusion: The assessee's claim for transit sale was accepted and the assessment order of the Tribunal was set aside.