Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the hiring of earthmoving equipment under the agreement was a transfer of right to use goods amounting to a deemed sale and, therefore, outside the taxable service of supply of tangible goods for use, so as to justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The agreement showed that the hirer was restricted to the contractual purpose of use, but was responsible for safe custody, misuse or abuse, third-party disputes, and damage during the period of use. The hirer also bore VAT on the monthly invoice value. These terms indicated that possession and effective control had passed to the hirer, and that the transaction was on a rights-to-use basis. The budget clarification relied upon by the parties also supported the view that where VAT is payable on a deemed sale, service tax is not attracted under the category of supply of tangible goods for use. On that basis, the transaction was treated as a transfer of right to use goods rather than a taxable service.
Conclusion: The appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The stay petition was allowed in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: A transaction in which the hirer obtains the right to use goods with effective possession and control, and on which VAT is payable as a deemed sale, does not fall within the taxable service of supply of tangible goods for use.