TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal sets aside penalty under Rule 7C for non-provision of services, assessing officer's discretion</h1> <h3>M/s SUCHAK MARKETING PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, KOLKATA</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, due to the appellants' non-provision of ... Penalty for late filing of Nil return - Held that:- in view of the Board's Circular No.97/8/07-ST dated 23.08.2007, in the event, no service is rendered by the service provider, there is no requirement to file ST-3 Returns. - there is nothing contrary to that circular - as per Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, in the event, 'nil' returns are filed, the assessing officer had the discretion to waive the late fees for filing the ST-3 Returns. In my view, it is a fit case to invoke the proviso to Rule 7C and waive the late fees relating to the nil returns filed by the appellant during the period April, 2005 to March, 2008. - Penalty dropped. Issues:Penalty under Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 for late filing of 'nil' returns.Analysis:The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Kolkata. The appellants, engaged in providing taxable services, had filed six 'nil' returns in ST-3 form for the period from September 2005 to March 2008 on 18.11.2008. A show-cause notice was issued proposing penalties under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The adjudicating authority directed the appellants to pay Rs.12,000 for each ST-3 Return and imposed a penalty of Rs.2,000 under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the penalty under Section 77 but confirmed the penalty of Rs.12,000 under Rule 7C. The appellant then appealed against this decision.The appellant did not appear during the hearing despite receiving advance notice. The Department's representative reiterated the Commissioner (Appeals)'s findings, arguing that since the penalty under Section 77 was dropped, there was no reason to waive the late fees under Rule 7C. The Tribunal noted that the appellants were registered for providing taxable services but had not rendered any services or filed returns from April 2005 to March 2008. Referring to a Board's Circular, it was established that no service provider is required to file ST-3 Returns if no services are provided. Additionally, Rule 7C allows the assessing officer discretion to waive late fees for filing 'nil' returns. The Tribunal invoked the proviso to Rule 7C and waived the late fees for the 'nil' returns filed by the appellant. A previous Tribunal decision supported this view, leading to the setting aside of the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order and allowing the appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, due to the appellants' non-provision of services during the relevant period and the discretionary power of the assessing officer to waive late fees for 'nil' returns.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
