Tribunal allows single appeal against multiple notices, directs duty deposit within 12 weeks

The Tribunal held that the appellants' single appeal against the four show cause notices was maintainable as the original authority issued only one order. The appellants were directed to deposit the full duty amount within twelve weeks based on a previous stay order, with a stay on the balance of interest and penalty pending appeal disposal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Stay petitions filed by the appellants seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay the recovery of duty, interest, and penalties confirmed by Commissioner (Appeals).
2. Appellants cleared physician samples of P&P medicines under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, while the Department felt they should be assessed on a pro-rata basis under Section 4A.
3. Four show cause notices were issued and confirmed by the original authority in a single order, leading to an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals).
4. Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed duty amount but reduced the penalty, leading to the appellant's appeal against this decision.
5. Dispute regarding whether the appellant should have filed separate appeals against the four show cause notices or if a single appeal was sufficient.
6. The requirement of pre-deposit based on previous stay orders issued by the Tribunal.

Analysis:
1. The appellants filed stay petitions to seek waiver of pre-deposit and stay the recovery of duty, interest, and penalties confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The case involved the clearance of physician samples of P&P medicines under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, while the Department argued for assessment on a pro-rata basis under Section 4A.

2. Four show cause notices were issued and confirmed by the original authority in a single order, leading to an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner confirmed the duty amount but reduced the penalty, prompting the appellants to appeal against this decision.

3. The dispute arose regarding whether the appellants should have filed separate appeals against the four show cause notices or if a single appeal was sufficient. The appellants argued that since the order in original decided the four show cause notices collectively and did not assign separate serial numbers, a single appeal was appropriate.

4. The Tribunal noted that the original authority dispatched only one order in original to the appellants, indicating that one appeal filed by the appellants before the Commissioner (Appeals) was maintainable, and there was no requirement for the appellants to file four separate appeals against one order in original.

5. Regarding the stay petitions, the Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit the entire amount of duty involved in all four show cause notices within twelve weeks based on a previous stay order in the appellant's own case. Compliance was to be reported by a specified date, and on compliance, there would be a stay on the balance amount of interest and penalty pending the disposal of appeals.

---