TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Gujarat HC dismisses revenue appeals citing lack of jurisdiction due to respondent's location in Daman.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUSTOMS Versus RADHA MADHAV CO. LTD.</h3> The Gujarat HC dismissed revenue's appeals against a Tribunal order, citing lack of jurisdiction due to respondent's location in Daman. Appeals were ... Maintainability of appeal - Clandestine removal and undervaluation - appeal by revenue against judgment taken in RADHA MADHAV CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., DAMAN [2013 (6) TMI 395 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD] - Held that:- Since the assessee is located in the union territory of Daman reference may be made to Section 36 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and more particularly clause (b) thereof which defines “High Court” in relation to the Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Goa, Doman and Diu to mean the High Court at Bombay. Therefore, this Court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain these appeals. Appeals dismissed leaving it open for the revenue to carry the matter before the appropriate Court. The Gujarat High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals against a Tribunal order, stating that it does not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeals as the respondent assessee is located in the union territory of Daman. The appeals were dismissed, allowing the revenue to pursue the matter before the appropriate Court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
