Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery proceedings and notices issued to the transferee under the proviso to section 23 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act can be sustained where the transferor has not been shown to be untraceable and further relief in relation to service and opportunity to contest the assessment.
Analysis: Section 23 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act makes both transferor and transferee liable in respect of agricultural income, but the proviso renders the transferee liable for arrears only where the transferor cannot be found or the tax assessed on the transferor cannot be recovered from him. The statutory scheme requires that the condition in the proviso be satisfied before recovery is effected from the transferee. The assessment for the relevant year was completed under the procedural provision but the assessment order had not effectively reached the transferor; the transferor has admitted potential liability and sought an opportunity to contest the assessment. Given these facts, the statutory precondition for invoking transferee liability under the proviso was not shown to be satisfied at the time recovery proceedings were initiated against the transferee. The procedural defects in service and the transferor's unresolved opportunity to seek revision under the applicable provision render continued recovery from the transferee inappropriate pending compliance with the proviso and allowing the transferor an opportunity to contest the assessment.
Conclusion: Recovery notices and consequent attachment and sale notices against the transferee are quashed; the assessing authority is directed to furnish the assessment order to the transferor by registered post and to entertain any representation or revision filed by the transferor within the prescribed time, and no further recovery steps shall be taken against the transferee in respect of the subject property for the year in question.