Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, a leasing finance company, was entitled to depreciation under section 32 on vehicles leased out by it, and whether the transaction was a true lease or merely a financing arrangement.
Analysis: Depreciation under section 32 requires that the assessee be the owner of the asset and that the asset be used for the purposes of business. The vehicles were registered and insured in a manner consistent with the assessee's ownership for the purpose of the Income-tax Act, and the business receipts were assessed as business income. The governing test was not whether the assessee physically used the vehicles, but whether the assets were utilized in the course of its business. The legal fiction in the Motor Vehicles Act concerning registration did not displace ownership for income-tax purposes. The later Supreme Court ruling on the same issue was applied, holding that a lessor in such a leasing arrangement is the owner for section 32 purposes.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to depreciation under section 32, and the first substantial question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The remaining question did not survive for adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a lessor can be treated as the owner of leased vehicles and satisfy the user requirement where the assets are employed in the assessee's business, even if the lessees physically operate them.