Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (6) TMI 45 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court affirms deduction for export of cut marble blocks under section 80HHC The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's decision, allowing the deduction under section 80HHC for the export of cut and polished marble ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court affirms deduction for export of cut marble blocks under section 80HHC

                          The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's decision, allowing the deduction under section 80HHC for the export of cut and polished marble blocks. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the court ruled in favor of the assessees, emphasizing that any process adding value to the commodity qualifies for the deduction. Additionally, the court held that Circular No. 693 did not hinder the assessees' eligibility for the deduction.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Eligibility for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for export of marble blocks.
                          2. Interpretation and applicability of Circular No. 693, dated November 17, 1994.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80HHC:

                          The primary issue was whether the assessees were eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for exporting marble blocks that were cut and polished. The Revenue contended that the exported marble blocks were not polished as required by the Twelfth Schedule and Circular No. 693, and thus, there was no value addition in terms of cost. Consequently, they argued that the assessees were not entitled to the deduction.

                          The assessees, on the other hand, claimed that the marble blocks were indeed cut and polished, thereby fulfilling the conditions for the deduction. They supported their claim with invoices, vouchers, and certificates. They also relied on the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT v. God Granites, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court, stating that any process that adds value to the marketable commodity qualifies for the deduction.

                          The judgment emphasized that the Act does not specify the degree or extent of cutting and polishing required. It was noted that any process that adds value to the marketable commodity would create eligibility for the deduction. The court referred to the Karnataka High Court's interpretation, which stated that the final shape, size, and polishing could be determined by the end user, and the Act does not mandate final cutting and polishing before export.

                          The appellate authorities, including the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, had concurrently held in favor of the assessees, stating that the conditions for the deduction under section 80HHC were met. The court upheld these findings, noting that the assessees had provided sufficient evidence of cutting and polishing, and thus, the marble blocks were eligible for the deduction.

                          2. Interpretation and Applicability of Circular No. 693:

                          The second issue involved the interpretation and legal effect of Circular No. 693, dated November 17, 1994. The circular clarified that for availing the benefit under section 80HHC, the rock must be both cut and polished before export. The Revenue argued that the assessees did not meet this requirement.

                          However, the court found that the circular did not adversely affect the assessees' claims. It reiterated that the Act does not prescribe the degree of cutting and polishing, and any process that adds value qualifies for the deduction. The court noted that the marble blocks, after undergoing cutting and polishing, fetched higher profits, indicating high value addition.

                          The court also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Sudarshan Silks and Sarees v. CIT, which stated that the High Court could only question the Tribunal's findings if they were perverse. Since the Tribunal's findings were in favor of the assessees and not challenged as perverse by the Revenue, the High Court upheld these findings.

                          Conclusion:

                          The court concluded that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the deduction under section 80HHC for the export of cut and polished marble blocks. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the assessees and against the Revenue. The court also held that Circular No. 693 did not adversely affect the assessees' claims for the deduction.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found