CENVAT credit and excise duty option upheld where duty payment was used to avoid cascading tax burden

Coal India Limited's decision to move from exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-C.E. to payment of central excise duty at 5% plus cess in order to avail CENVAT credit was treated as a permissible tax choice intended to avoid cascading duty and benefit end consumers. The court accepted that only a small portion of coal was sold to traders and that the larger volume reached end users, so the public-interest objection raised by traders had no merit. The challenge to that duty structure and credit position was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether Coal India Limited could levy central excise duty at 5% with cess so as to avail CENVAT credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and whether the petitioners as traders could challenge that decision on the ground of public interest.

Analysis: Coal India Limited had earlier availed the exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-C.E. dated 01.03.2011. It later decided to pay duty at the higher rate in order to avail CENVAT credit and avoid the cascading effect of excise duty. The Court noted that only a small portion of coal was sold to traders, while the larger segment went to end users, and accepted that the decision was taken to benefit the final consumers. The Court also agreed with the reasoning of the Gauhati High Court that traders purchasing coal in this manner had no merit in objecting to the option exercised by Coal India Limited.

Conclusion: The challenge failed and the decision of Coal India Limited to avail CENVAT credit and levy duty accordingly was upheld.

---