Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether any referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's finding deleting the addition made under section 43B in respect of sales tax liabilities shown in the balance sheet.
Analysis: The disputed amount represented sales tax realisation of the last month of the previous year relevant to the assessment year. It became payable in the next month under the sales tax law and was in fact paid in November 1983. The assessee had not claimed the amount as a deduction and had not debited it to the profit and loss account. On these facts, the Tribunal found that no disallowance was called for merely because the amount appeared on the liabilities side of the balance sheet, and that no question of making an add back from the profit and loss account arose.
Conclusion: No question of law arose for reference, and the application under section 256(2) was not maintainable.