Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings under Section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Revenue could recover interest and penalty arising from the company's assessment from its director.
Analysis: Section 179 uses the expression "tax due", whereas the Act separately refers to tax, interest and penalty in other recovery and demand provisions. The Court relied on the statutory scheme and the earlier binding decision to hold that the director's vicarious liability under Section 179 is confined to the company's unpaid tax dues and cannot be extended to interest or penalty. The director may be treated as an assessee only to the extent of the company's tax liability, not for interest or penalty liabilities imposed on the company.
Conclusion: Recovery of interest and penalty from the petitioner under Section 179 was held impermissible and the impugned recovery action was set aside.