1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed Due to Late Filing; Commissioner Can't Extend Time</h1> The appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the 60-day limitation period set by Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) ... Delay in filling appeal of 67 days beyond the initial period of limitation of 60 days - appeal dismissed - Held that:- The proviso to Section 35 authorises the Commissioner (Appeals), if satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid period of sixty days, to present an appeal within a further period of thirty days. No discretion is granted to the Commissioner (Appeals) to condone a delay of 67 days beyond the initial period of limitation of sixty days. Thus dismissal of the appeal is in conformity with the text and context of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal was dismissed as it was filed 67 days beyond the 60-day limitation period set by Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) has no discretion to condone a delay beyond the initial 60 days. The dismissal of the appeal was found to be in line with the law, and the appellate order stands without any need for interference. The appeal was deemed misconceived and was accordingly dismissed.