High Court Kerala modifies CST Act assessment order, reduces payment from Rs.25 cr to Rs.20 cr, provides security

The High Court of Kerala modified the impugned order in a case concerning assessment under the CST Act for 2005-2006. The appellant successfully convinced the Single Judge to amend the conditional order of stay, reducing the payment amount from Rs.25 crores to Rs.20 crores and requiring security for the remaining balance. The court directed the appellant to remit the revised amount and provide security within one month to suspend all proceedings until the appeal's resolution, aiming to address the appellant's objections while ensuring justice.

---

---

Issues:
1. Assessment under the CST Act for the year 2005-2006.
2. Dispute over conditions imposed in the conditional order of stay.
3. Modification of the conditional order of stay by the learned Single Judge.
4. Appeal against the order directing payment of Rs.25 crores.
5. Appellant's claim of no amount due and reference to previous court orders.
6. Decision on the modification of the impugned order and the directed payment amount.

The judgment by the High Court of Kerala pertains to a writ petition filed by the appellant seeking various reliefs regarding an assessment under the CST Act for the year 2005-2006. The dispute primarily revolves around the conditions set in the conditional order of stay, specifically Ext.P7. The appellant managed to persuade the learned Single Judge to modify Ext.P7, which required the payment of Rs.25 crores within two weeks along with providing security. However, the appellant was dissatisfied with this judgment and appealed.

During the proceedings, the appellant argued that no amount was actually due and referred to previous court orders, particularly Ext.P3, where a Division Bench allowed the appeal in part and granted a conditional stay on remitting Rs.10 crores instead of 1/4th of the KGST and VAT due. The total tax demand was stated to be Rs.478 crores. After hearing both parties, the High Court decided to modify the impugned order further. The court directed the appellant to pay Rs.20 crores instead of Rs.25 crores as ordered by the Single Judge and furnish security for the remaining amount.

Consequently, the Writ Appeal was partially allowed, and it was mandated that if the appellant remits Rs.20 crores and provides security for the balance amount to the satisfaction of the assessing officer within one month from the judgment date, all proceedings would be suspended until the appeal's disposal. This judgment aimed to balance the interests of justice while addressing the appellant's concerns regarding the payment amount and security requirement.

---