Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference could be compelled under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 only on the question which arose from the Tribunal's order, and whether questions not raised before the Tribunal under section 256(1) could be introduced for the first time in the application under section 256(2).
Analysis: Questions not raised before the Tribunal in the application under section 256(1) could not be permitted to be raised for the first time under section 256(2). On the other hand, the question whether income taxed in the hands of the beneficiaries could again be taxed in the hands of the assessee-trust was found to arise from the Tribunal's order. The earlier decision relied upon by the Tribunal had not answered that question on merits and did not bar reference of the issue.
Conclusion: The application succeeded only in respect of the question which arose from the Tribunal's order, and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and make a reference on that question.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings for a reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, only a question of law arising from the Tribunal's order can be compelled to be referred, and a question not raised before the Tribunal cannot be introduced for the first time in the reference application.