TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Remands Case on Article 8 Benefits & Permanent Establishment Determination</h1> <h3>Hapag –Llyod AG Versus Additional Director of Income-tax (International Taxation)</h3> Hapag –Llyod AG Versus Additional Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) - TMI Issues:1. Interpretation of DTAA regarding benefit eligibility for freight income2. Classification of agreements as pool/joint business or slot arrangements3. Reliance on Section 115VB of the Act for interpreting undefined terms in DTAA4. Determination of agency permanent establishment in India5. Relevance of remuneration paid to agent in taxing profits and gains in IndiaInterpretation of DTAA regarding benefit eligibility for freight income:The High Court considered whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Article 8 of the DTAA for freight income received on transportation of cargo on vessels pooled with consortium partners. The Court questioned the justification of the ITAT's decision and remanded the matter for fresh consideration based on a previous judgment involving similar issues.Classification of agreements as pool/joint business or slot arrangements:Another issue raised was the classification of agreements entered into by the appellant as either pool/joint business agreements or slot arrangements. The ITAT's decision regarding the eligibility of profits from transportation of cargo under 'slot arrangements' for Article 8 benefits was challenged. The Court set aside the impugned order for reconsideration in light of a previous court decision, keeping all contentions open.Reliance on Section 115VB of the Act for interpreting undefined terms in DTAA:The Court deliberated on whether the definition of 'operation of ships' in Section 115VB of the Act could be used to interpret the same term not defined in the DTAA. This issue was part of the considerations for determining the eligibility of benefits under the DTAA.Determination of agency permanent establishment in India:The ITAT's decision on the existence of an agency permanent establishment in India for the appellant was questioned. The Court did not provide a final ruling on this issue but remanded the matter for fresh consideration, indicating that all arguments could be presented before the Tribunal.Relevance of remuneration paid to agent in taxing profits and gains in India:Lastly, the Court examined whether the remuneration paid to the agent was a relevant factor for taxing profits and gains in India. The ITAT's decision on this matter was challenged, and the Court directed a fresh consideration by the Tribunal based on a previous court decision, without making a definitive ruling on the issue.
TaxTMI 