TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal partially allows appeal on interest payments classification, processing charges ruled as revenue expenditure.</h1> <h3>KSS. Abhishek Safety Systems Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, New Delhi</h3> KSS. Abhishek Safety Systems Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, New Delhi - TMI Issues involved:1. Classification of interest paid to HSIDC as capital in nature.2. Classification of interest paid on building term loan as capital in nature.3. Treatment of processing charges as capital expenditure.Issue 1: Classification of interest paid to HSIDC as capital in natureThe appellant challenged the lower authorities' decision to treat the interest paid to HSIDC as capital in nature, amounting to Rs.15,19,372. The Assessing Officer observed that the interest pertained to land on which factory construction had begun and was shown under capital work in progress. The appellant argued that the interest was incurred to further its business at new premises, making it allowable under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant cited relevant case laws to support their claim. However, the Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, stating that interest on loans for assets not yet put to use is not allowable as a deduction. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed this ground of appeal.Issue 2: Classification of interest paid on building term loan as capital in natureThe appellant contested the classification of Rs.2,21,034 as interest paid on a building term loan as capital in nature. The Assessing Officer disallowed this amount, considering the loan disbursed for the construction of the factory building as capital expenditure. The appellant argued that the loan amount was utilized from profits and working capital, making the interest a revenue expenditure. The Tribunal, however, agreed with the Assessing Officer, stating that interest on loans for assets not yet put to use cannot be claimed as a deduction. Therefore, this ground of appeal was also dismissed.Issue 3: Treatment of processing charges as capital expenditureThe Assessing Officer disallowed Rs.48,250 as processing charges incurred on a term loan for the construction of the factory, considering it as a capital expenditure. The appellant argued that these charges were incurred during the course of business and should be treated as revenue expenditure, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, stating that processing charges were of revenue nature and hence allowable. Therefore, this ground of appeal was allowed.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, dismissing the first two issues related to the classification of interest payments as capital in nature but allowing the third issue regarding the treatment of processing charges as revenue expenditure.
TaxTMI 