Declared import value cannot be rejected on quotation alone without reliable contemporaneous evidence supporting enhancement

Declared transaction value for imported goods could not be rejected merely on the basis of a quotation and unsupported contemporaneous material. Because the goods were purchased on a high sea sales basis and the declared price was backed by the bill of entry and commercial invoice, the Revenue needed positive evidence of comparable imports or other reliable material to justify enhancement under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. In the absence of such evidence, and where alleged undervaluation material was not included in the show-cause notice, valuation enhancement was held unsustainable. The related confiscation consequences and penalty also did not survive.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared assessable value of the imported goods could be enhanced on the basis of a quotation and alleged contemporaneous materials, and whether the valuation made under Rule 8 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 was sustainable.

Analysis: The imported goods were purchased on a high sea sales basis, and the declared price was supported by the bill of entry and commercial invoice. The contemporaneous material relied upon by the Revenue was found insufficient, as the quotation could not by itself justify rejection of the transaction value in the absence of positive evidence of comparable imports. The evidence regarding alleged undervaluation was also not part of the show-cause notice, and the goods referred to by the importer were not shown to be materially different in a manner that would support enhancement. The Revenue failed to produce reliable material to disbelieve the declared price or to establish a valid basis for rejecting the transaction value.

Conclusion: The enhancement of the declared value was not sustainable and the appellant succeeded on the valuation issue.

Final Conclusion: The orders of enhancement, confiscation-related consequences and penalty did not survive, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: A quotation cannot be treated as sufficient basis to reject the declared transaction value unless supported by positive evidence of contemporaneous imports or other reliable material justifying valuation enhancement.

---