Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court criticizes lack of reasoning in ITAT decision under Income-tax Act, discharges rule, parties to bear costs.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Hukumchand Mills Limited</h3> The High Court of Bombay discharged the rule in a case involving the rejection of an application under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act by the ... Application To Direct Reference, Practice The High Court of Bombay discharged the rule in a case involving the rejection of an application under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal's decision lacked reasoning for rejection, referencing only an earlier order without providing details. The Court criticized this practice and emphasized the need for clear reasoning in such decisions. The Court discharged the rule but directed the parties to bear their own costs. (Case citation: 1988 (10) TMI 4 - BOMBAY High Court)