Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the liability arising under a joint guarantee agreement was deductible while computing the value of the estate for estate duty purposes.
Analysis: The liability under the guarantee agreement was a bona fide contractual liability for full consideration. A surety's liability is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, and the deceased remained liable on the date of death. Since the bank had already pursued recovery from the principal debtor without success, no effective reimbursement was available. As the liability was joint and several, section 44(b) of the Estate Duty Act limited the deduction to the deceased's share of the burden.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in allowing deduction of one-half of the guarantee liability from the estate of the deceased, and the answer was in favour of the accountable person.
Final Conclusion: The estate was entitled to deduction of half of the joint guarantee liability, while the second question was not answered because it became unnecessary in view of the first answer.
Ratio Decidendi: A joint and several liability arising from a guarantee is deductible from the estate to the extent that no right of reimbursement is effectively available, but only to the extent of the deceased's own share where the liability is shared with another person.