Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that there was a genuine sub-partnership entitled to registration.
Analysis: The questions relating to devolution of the deceased partner's interest and the character of the share as joint family property were held not to arise from the Tribunal's order and were declined to be answered. On the surviving issue, the Tribunal had applied the settled principle that a sub-partnership is a recognised legal concept and that such a sub-partnership may be registered under the Income-tax Act when otherwise genuine.
Conclusion: The answer on the surviving issue was in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee; the reference was answered only to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The judgment upheld registration of the sub-partnership while declining to answer the two questions that did not arise from the Tribunal's order.
Ratio Decidendi: A genuine sub-partnership recognised in law is entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act if the statutory requirements are satisfied.