Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was entitled to relief under section 91(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the full amount of tax deducted in the foreign country on foreign salary earned abroad; (ii) Whether, under section 16(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, standard deduction was separately admissible in respect of salary received from each employer.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was entitled to relief under section 91(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the full amount of tax deducted in the foreign country on foreign salary earned abroad.
Analysis: The question was answered on the same footing as the connected reference decided on identical facts. The relief under section 91(1) was confined to the tax attributable to the foreign income assessable in India, and not to the entire tax deducted abroad on the gross foreign salary.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether, under section 16(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, standard deduction was separately admissible in respect of salary received from each employer.
Analysis: Explanation 1 inserted retrospectively by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984 declared that where salary is due from or paid by more than one employer, the deduction is to be computed with reference to the aggregate salary and cannot exceed the prescribed limit. The statutory amendment removed any basis for claiming separate standard deduction from each employer.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered wholly in favour of the Revenue, and both questions were answered against the assessee on the basis that foreign tax relief is limited to the permissible attributable amount and standard deduction is computable only on aggregate salary from all employers.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a retrospective statutory explanation declares that salary from multiple employers must be aggregated for standard deduction, the deduction is limited to the aggregate salary and cannot be claimed separately from each employer; similarly, foreign tax relief is restricted to the amount legally attributable to the income assessable in India.