Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, though having manufacturing work carried out through an outside contractor, was engaged in the manufacture of goods so as to be treated as an industrial company entitled to the concessional rate of tax.
Analysis: The relevant test was whether the assessee was mainly engaged in manufacture or processing of goods within the meaning of the Finance Act. The assessee had supplied the plant and machinery, mostly supplied the raw materials, furnished technical know-how, drawings, specifications and instructions, and retained supervision and control over the fabrication process. The contractor functioned substantially as a labour contractor and the finished goods were accepted only after final inspection. On these facts, the manufacturing activity was held to be that of the assessee, even though the actual fabrication was done by another entity.
Conclusion: The assessee was held to be an industrial company and was entitled to the concessional rate of tax.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessee may be regarded as engaged in manufacture, and therefore as an industrial company, where the manufacturing is carried out through another agency under its effective supervision and control, with its plant, materials and technical inputs, and the activity is in substance the assessee's own manufacture.