TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court allows hot drink expenses as legitimate business expense, not entertainment.</h1> <h3>Royal Calcutta Turf Club Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax</h3> Royal Calcutta Turf Club Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax - [1991] 188 ITR 352, 57 TAXMANN 185 Issues Involved: The judgment involves determining the allowability of expenditure on 'refreshments' for the assessment year 1971-72, specifically focusing on the nature of expenses related to hot drinks, soft drinks, and tobacco served to various individuals in the context of a race club.Expenditure on Refreshments: The assessee claimed a total expenditure of Rs. 1,66,585 on refreshments, including hot drinks, soft drinks, and tobacco, for different categories of individuals associated with the race club. The Income-tax Officer disallowed a significant portion of the claimed expenses, citing that expenses on drinks and tobacco did not constitute legitimate business expenditure.Disallowed Expenses: The Income-tax Officer disallowed expenses incurred on hot drinks, soft drinks, and tobacco served to stewards, their friends, and guests, treating them as entertainment expenditure. Additionally, expenses on parties and events were also disallowed partially, based on estimates and perceived lack of business necessity.Appellate Proceedings: The Appellate Assistant Commissioner reduced the disallowance made by the Income-tax Officer, emphasizing the need for accurate estimation. However, the Tribunal further reviewed the case, considering the necessity and business exigencies behind the expenditure on refreshments.Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal differentiated between expenses on snacks, tea for employees, and hot drinks served to stewards and VIPs, deeming the latter as not wholly and exclusively laid out for business purposes. It questioned the disallowance made by the lower authorities and reduced the disallowance to Rs. 40,000, based on a reasonable assessment.Legal Precedents and Arguments: The assessee relied on legal precedents from the Gujarat High Court and the Karnataka High Court, emphasizing that expenditure on refreshments, when necessary for business operations, should not be categorized as entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal's decision was challenged based on the long-standing custom of serving hot drinks to stewards and officials on race days.Judicial Interpretation: The judgment highlighted the principle that expenditure must be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business to be considered allowable. It emphasized that the nature of expenditure should be viewed in the context of business necessity and commercial trading practices to determine its allowability.Conclusion: The High Court, concurring with the assessee's arguments, held that the expenditure on hot drinks served on race days to stewards and officials was incidental to the trade and incurred for business promotion, not entertainment. It emphasized that as long as the expenditure was reasonable and aimed at promoting business activities, it should be allowed as a revenue expenditure.Final Verdict: The court answered the question in the negative, favoring the assessee, and directed that the expenditure on hot drinks served on race days should be considered allowable as a business expenditure. No costs were awarded in the case.Judges: - AJIT K. SENGUPTA J.- BHAGABATI PROSAD BANERJEE J.
TaxTMI 