Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 read with section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid in the absence of fresh information and when the attempted reopening appeared to be only a rectification of the officer's own earlier mistakes.
Analysis: The notice was found to rest on no real information justifying reopening. The materials showed that the Income-tax Officer was seeking to correct mistakes already committed in the original assessment, including allowance of higher depreciation and computation of repairs, and the matter of closing stock reflected only a change of opinion. Such errors, if at all, were matters for rectification rather than reassessment, and the record did not support the statutory precondition for action under section 147(b) read with section 148.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was invalid and liable to be quashed.