TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Partnership Firm Changes Deemed Reconstitution under Income-tax Act</h1> The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the changes in the partnership firm constituted a reconstitution under section 187(2)(a) of the ... Firm Issues:1. Whether two separate assessments should be made for two distinct periods.2. Whether the assessee-firm should be considered as reconstituted under section 187(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The case involved a partnership firm with five partners, where significant changes occurred during the assessment year 1972-73. Following the death of a partner and the retirement of three others on November 1, 1971, leaving only one partner, the firm underwent changes. On the same day, the remaining partner admitted two new partners, and the business continued. The firm maintained two sets of accounts for the periods April 1, 1971, to October 31, 1971, and November 1, 1971, to March 31, 1972. The Income-tax Officer initially made one assessment for the entire year, considering it a reconstitution of the firm and enhancing the income. The assessee contended that separate assessments should be made for the two distinct periods, which was accepted by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner but challenged by the Department.The key issue before the court was to determine whether the changes in the firm constituted a reconstitution or a succession of one firm by another on November 1, 1971. The court emphasized the provisions of section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, which define a change in the constitution of a firm. The section specifies that if partners cease to be partners or new partners are admitted, and some of the existing partners continue after the change, it constitutes a reconstitution. The court referred to a previous judgment to support its decision, highlighting that in similar circumstances, it was considered a case of reconstitution.Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, concluding that the changes in the firm constituted a reconstitution as per the provisions of section 187(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of the legal definition of reconstitution in determining the tax implications of changes in a partnership firm.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
