Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a gift of immovable property becomes effective for gift-tax purposes on the date of execution of the deed or only on the date of its registration.
Analysis: A gift of immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act must be made by a registered instrument, and section 17(1)(a) of the Registration Act also requires registration of such an instrument. Section 47 of the Registration Act gives a registered document operation from the date of execution as between the parties for the limited purpose of priority and operative effect, but it does not dispense with registration as the point at which the transfer is completed. The earlier authorities relied on by the Court show that the gift becomes complete only when the registered instrument comes into existence, and the retrospective operation under section 47 cannot be used to treat an unregistered gift as completed on the execution date. As against the Revenue, which is a third party to the deed, the effective date is the date of registration.
Conclusion: The gift became effective on the date of registration, not on the date of execution, and the immovable property gifted was rightly included in the taxable gift for the relevant assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: For gift-tax purposes, a gift of immovable property is complete only on registration of the gift deed, and section 47 of the Registration Act does not advance the date of completion to the date of execution against third parties including the Revenue.