Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and penalty orders were vitiated for want of a personal hearing under Section 6(5) of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Luxuries in Hotels and Lodging Houses Act, 1981.
Analysis: The provision required the assessing authority, before determining tax payable and imposing penalty, to give the proprietor an opportunity of being heard. The petitioners had specifically sought documents and cross-examination in their objections, and the proceedings culminated in a tax demand and penalty without granting a personal hearing. In such circumstances, compliance with the statutory hearing requirement and the principles of natural justice was mandatory. The plea for cross-examination was not finally directed by the Court and was left to the discretion of the authority on remand.
Conclusion: The impugned proceedings were set aside for breach of the hearing requirement and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration after affording personal hearing.