Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to appointment of an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 despite the respondent's reliance on a no claim certificate and the contention that the dispute was an excepted matter.
Analysis: The application was maintainable before the proper High Court and there was an arbitration agreement between the parties. The respondent resisted reference on the basis that the contractor had signed a no claim certificate and, therefore, the claims stood finally settled and were excluded from arbitration. The Court applied the principles governing Section 11 proceedings and held that the question whether the discharge voucher or no claim certificate was voluntary or obtained under duress was a matter that could be left to the arbitral tribunal. On the facts placed before it, the Court found a prima facie case that the certificate had been obtained under financial duress. Questions relating to whether the claim was live or dead, whether the contract had been discharged by accord and satisfaction, and whether the claim fell within the arbitration clause were held to be matters for the arbitrator.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to reference of the disputes to arbitration, and the respondent's objection based on the no claim certificate did not bar appointment of an arbitrator.
Ratio Decidendi: A disputed no claim certificate or discharge voucher, when challenged as having been obtained under duress, does not by itself extinguish the arbitration agreement or bar appointment of an arbitrator, and the issue of accord and satisfaction is for the arbitral tribunal.