Appeals partially allowed by Tribunal, remitting issues for fresh consideration. Precedents and judicial pronouncements impact outcome.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both the assessee and the Revenue. Various issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with earlier judgments and directions. The Tribunal's decisions were based on precedents set in the assessee's own case for earlier years and relevant judicial pronouncements, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition on account of sales to Johnson & Johnson Exports Limited.
2. Disallowance of MODVAT excise duty credit.
3. Disallowance of provision for Executive Retirement Scheme (ERS).
4. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IB.
5. Provision of cash discount.
6. Disallowance of expenses related to exempt dividend income.
7. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80HHC on rent.
8. Disallowance u/s 80HHC on miscellaneous income and service charges.
9. Deletion of addition on account of sales to Johnson & Johnson Exports Limited.
10. Treatment of production of ad films as capital vs. revenue expenditure.
11. Exclusion of excise duty and trade discount from total turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC.
12. Depreciation on testing equipment.
13. Disallowance of payments made to persons specified u/s 40A(2)(b).
14. Disallowance towards provision for bonus.
15. Denial of deduction u/s 80-IB on certain items of miscellaneous income.
16. Disallowance u/s 80HHC on write back of liabilities, miscellaneous income, and recovery of R & D cost.
17. Disallowance of hotel expenses.
18. Disallowance of club entrance fee.
19. Disallowance of professional sponsorship expenses.
20. Exclusion of excise duty and trade discount from total turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition on Account of Sales to Johnson & Johnson Exports Limited:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer (A.O.) for fresh decision, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for earlier years.

2. Disallowance of MODVAT Excise Duty Credit:
The Tribunal restored the matter to the A.O. for re-working the disallowance, if any, subject to certain verifications, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 1999-2000.

3. Disallowance of Provision for Executive Retirement Scheme (ERS):
The Tribunal directed the A.O. to allow deduction for ERS on a payment basis as against the provision basis claimed by the assessee, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for earlier years.

4. Disallowance of Deduction u/s 80-IB:
The Tribunal upheld the view taken by the learned CIT(A) and decided this issue against the assessee, as there was no distinguishing feature on the facts of this ground vis-`a-vis the earlier year.

5. Provision of Cash Discount:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the A.O. for deciding it in conformity with the view taken by the Tribunal in the earlier year, allowing deduction of cash discount to the extent of actual payment.

6. Disallowance of Expenses Related to Exempt Dividend Income:
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 2% of the gross dividend as incidental expenses for earning exempt income, as the provisions of section 14A applied to the exempt dividend income u/s 10(33) of the Act.

7. Disallowance of Deduction u/s 80HHC on Rent:
The Tribunal directed that "netting off" of rent paid should be done against the rent received, and only 90% of such net rent income should be considered for disallowance u/s 80HHC, following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associate Capsules Private Limited v. CIT.

8. Disallowance u/s 80HHC on Miscellaneous Income and Service Charges:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the A.O. for deciding this issue afresh item-wise by considering relevant Tribunal orders, as both sides agreed to this approach.

9. Deletion of Addition on Account of Sales to Johnson & Johnson Exports Limited:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the file of the A.O. for deciding it in conformity with the directions contained in the earlier Tribunal order, as both sides agreed that the facts and circumstances were similar to those of earlier years.

10. Treatment of Production of Ad Films as Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure:
The Tribunal upheld the impugned order treating the expenditure on production of ad films as revenue expenditure, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for earlier years.

11. Exclusion of Excise Duty and Trade Discount from Total Turnover for Deduction u/s 80HHC:
The Tribunal approved the impugned order on this issue, following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lakshmi Machine Works.

12. Depreciation on Testing Equipment:
The Tribunal upheld the impugned order allowing depreciation on testing equipment provided to laboratories and hospitals free of charge, following the precedent set in the case of the assessee's sister concern.

13. Disallowance of Payments Made to Persons Specified u/s 40A(2)(b):
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance on account of royalty payments, as the payments were made to Johnson & Johnson, USA after due approval from RBI. However, the Tribunal overturned the impugned order on the disallowance of 10% of the value of goods purchased from sister concerns, as the A.O. did not demonstrate that the payments were excessive.

14. Disallowance Towards Provision for Bonus:
This ground was not pressed by the learned AR and was dismissed.

15. Denial of Deduction u/s 80-IB on Certain Items of Miscellaneous Income:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the matter to the file of the A.O. for fresh decision, considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Liberty India v. CIT.

16. Disallowance u/s 80HHC on Write Back of Liabilities, Miscellaneous Income, and Recovery of R & D Cost:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the file of the A.O. for deciding the question of allowability of deduction u/s 80HHC on these items, following the view taken in the appeal for the assessment year 2000-2001.

17. Disallowance of Hotel Expenses:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of hotel expenses incurred on visitors, as it was natural to arrange for their stay when guests were entertained by the assessee.

18. Disallowance of Club Entrance Fee:
The Tribunal approved the view taken by the learned CIT(A) allowing deduction of club entrance fee in the year of incurring, following the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Otis Elevator v. CIT.

19. Disallowance of Professional Sponsorship Expenses:
The Tribunal upheld the view taken by the learned CIT(A) deleting the disallowance of 10% of professional sponsorship expenses, as the expenditure was for business purposes.

20. Exclusion of Excise Duty and Trade Discount from Total Turnover for Deduction u/s 80HHC:
The Tribunal upheld the impugned order on this issue, following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Laxmi Machine Works.

Conclusion:
The appeals were partly allowed for both the assessee and the Revenue, with several issues remitted back to the A.O. for fresh consideration in light of earlier judgments and directions.

---