Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund or special rebate of excess input tax/advance tax after reselling the goods at a reduced rate, and whether the rejection of the refund claim under Section 12 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was lawful.
Analysis: The claim arose from entry tax paid under the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994 and advance tax paid on the purchase value determined for check-post purposes. The fourth proviso to Section 12 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 limits the special rebate, in cases where goods on which tax under Section 3 of the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994 has been paid are resold at a reduced rate, to the output tax payable in respect of such goods or goods manufactured out of such goods. The Court held that although the purchase value includes freight and other components under Section 2(n) of the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994, the final figure still represents the purchase value for determining entry tax and for assessing whether the sale was at a reduced rate.
Conclusion: The petitioner's refund claim was not maintainable, and the rejection order did not suffer from illegality.