TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court quashes Income Tax Act notice for assessment year 2007-08. Reasons for reopening assessment deemed a change of opinion.</h1> <h3>Metal Alloys Corporation Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> Metal Alloys Corporation Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax - [2013] 350 ITR 245 (Guj.) Issues:Challenge to notice for reopening assessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The High Court of Gujarat heard a writ petition challenging a notice dated August 6, 2010, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Income-tax Circle II, Jamnagar, regarding the assessment year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer had reopened the assessment order dated October 14, 2008, citing irregular deductions under section 10B of the Act. The court noted that assessment orders can be reopened within four years if new material is discovered or if the assessee concealed relevant information. In this case, the court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment were merely a change of opinion, as the assessee had provided all necessary details during the assessment proceedings. The court held that since there was no concealment or failure to disclose relevant material, the notice issued under section 148 of the Act was unwarranted and should be quashed.The court further elaborated that the assessee had filed the return on October 25, 2007, which was processed under section 143(1) of the Act on October 14, 2008. The total income was accepted at Rs. 38,88,083, with a deduction claimed under section 10B of the Act at Rs. 1,60,55,803. However, the deduction was restricted to Rs. 1,57,57,803 for the assessment year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer contended that the irregular deductions allowed were against the provisions of section 10B(2) of the Act, making the assessee ineligible for the deduction. Despite queries raised during the assessment proceedings, the court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment did not align with the facts, leading to the decision to quash the notice issued under section 148 of the Act.In conclusion, the High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice dated August 6, 2010, issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2007-08. The court directed that each party would bear their own costs in this matter.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
