Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax paid on insurance premium for recall of damaged products was admissible as Cenvat credit as an input service.
Analysis: The definition of input service under Rule 2(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is wide and includes services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture as well as services relating to business. The insurance cover was obtained in connection with the manufacturer's business requirement and had a direct nexus with the manufactured final products, since it related to reimbursement of expenses incurred for recalling products due to damage or injury caused by use or consumption. In view of the broad scope of the definition and the Tribunal's earlier view on business-related services, the credit could not be denied merely because the service was not used in the actual manufacturing process.
Conclusion: The service tax paid on the insurance premium was admissible as Cenvat credit and the appeal succeeded.