Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed transfer of listed shares attracted tax liability in view of the exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the advance ruling holding no tax liability called for interference in writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: The transfer related to listed equity shares, and income arising from the transfer of a long-term capital asset being an equity share, where the transaction is chargeable to securities transaction tax, falls within the exemption under section 10(38). The provisions of Chapter VII of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, including the definition of taxable securities transaction and the levy of securities transaction tax, supported the view that the transaction answered the statutory conditions for exemption. The objection based on treaty shopping was treated as answered by the statutory exemption itself, and no illegality in the advance ruling was shown to justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: The proposed transfer was exempt from tax under section 10(38), and the advance ruling was left undisturbed.